What Happens When A Reporter Refuses To Name An Anonymous Source When Ordered To Do So In Court Is Found To Be Contempt?

Can a journalist reveal their source?

JOURNALISTS must protect their confidential sources if the Press is to safeguard the interests of society.

Even so, courts do attempt to force journalists to reveal their sources..

Can journalists break the law?

Even though the journalists are on good ethical ground, they still don’t have a right to violate the law.”

Why do journalists argue that freedom of the press requires that they protect confidential sources?

Proponents of protecting confidential sources argue that journalists need a well-established legal privilege, similar to the attorney-client privilege or doctor-patient privilege, to protect them from being forced to reveal confidential information in court.

Are there any circumstances under which reporters should be required to reveal or protect?

A reporter/journalist can protect and keep confidential a confidential source unless the government can prove:1) That there is probable cause to believe the reporter has info that is relevant to a specific violation of the law.

Can a journalist be forced to reveal confidential sources UK?

One of the principles laid down by the NUJ’s code of conduct is that “a journalist shall protect confidential sources of information”. There are no exceptions. Any order for disclosure of sources will therefore force a journalist to consider where his primary duty lies.

What law protects reporters from revealing their sources?

Statutory journalists’ privilege (which provides similar protections to journalists and their sources) has been enacted in various other jurisdictions, including the Commonwealth, NSW, the ACT and WA.

Is it illegal to have a shield?

The California shield law applies to both the source of information (“confidential sources”) and to “unpublished information” such as notes, out-takes, unpublished photographs and tapes. … On the other hand, when the prosecution seeks information in a criminal law, the shield law is absolute.

Can a journalist be forced to reveal confidential sources?

The idea behind reporter’s privilege is that journalists have a limited First Amendment right not to be forced to reveal information or confidential news sources in court. Journalists rely on confidential sources to write stories that deal with matters of legitimate public importance.

What advice should journalists give to sources who demand confidentiality?

If your source demands confidentiality, make sure you intend to maintain confidentiality if you agree. Also, no matter what you decide, it is a good idea to be clear with your source about what he or she should expect with respect to confidentiality.

Can a reporter refuses to reveal source?

Federal shield statute. Nope. … Roughly 30 states have passed statutes, called shield laws, allowing journalists to refuse to disclose or testify about confidential or unpublished information, including the identity of sources. The statutes vary significantly from state to state in the scope of their protections.

Why do reporters keep their sources confidential?

Journalists rely on source protection to gather and reveal information in the public interest from confidential sources. Such sources may require anonymity to protect them from physical, economic or professional reprisals in response to their revelations.

What laws do journalists have to follow?

When writing a story, all journalists must consider both legal and ethical issues. Laws are in place to restrict journalists from reporting things which may damage or harm other people or organisations. Ethics means doing what is ethically and morally right, regardless of what the law might say.